In a payment dispute, the contractor refers to small print you never received. Or the terms say that all defects after handover are your responsibility. A reference does not mean every provision is valid. A construction lawyer first assesses which terms were agreed, when you could read them and whether the specific clause holds up. Keep the quotation, attachments and original messages; a current website showing terms alone does not establish what applied to your project.
Sources (3)
On this page
1. Start with the contracting parties and the correct version
Establish who concluded the agreement and for what purpose. A private individual renovating their own home has a different protected position from a business extending a commercial hall. The client named on paper and the actual payer may also differ. Give the lawyer the signed agreement, the parties’ names and an explanation of how the property is used.
Then prepare a timeline of the quotation, order, acceptance and receipt of the terms. A contractor cannot automatically impose a new version during the works by referring to it on an invoice. Do check whether a subsequent change was agreed. Keep old PDFs, emails and dated screenshots so the applicable wording can be linked to the actual instructions.
2. Incorporation and providing access are separate questions
General terms must have become part of the agreement. In addition, a consumer must in principle have had sufficient opportunity to read them before or when the contract was concluded. ACM ConsuWijzer says this can be done, for example, by providing a paper copy or an accessible digital version beforehand. Whether the chosen method suffices depends in part on how the agreement was made.
Do not therefore send only the statement “I signed nothing”. A contract can also arise through an email or conduct. Have someone investigate what you actually accepted and what information was available. If you were not given a reasonable opportunity to read the terms, setting them aside may be possible. Let the lawyer determine which declaration is needed and what exceptions or evidential problems arise.
3. An unfair term requires a specific assessment
Consumers have statutory black and grey lists. The black list contains terms regarded as unreasonably onerous; the grey list creates a presumption the business may rebut in the circumstances. A term outside these lists can also be unreasonably onerous. Calling it “usual in construction” does not determine the assessment.
Have, for example, a very broad exclusion of liability, unilateral price change or restriction of remedies examined precisely. The full wording, other agreements and circumstances matter. For unclear consumer terms, the interpretation most favourable to the consumer is relevant. This is no licence to ignore every payment obligation: removing a clause usually leaves the agreement and other provisions in place.
4. Construction rules may restrict departures
For building works contracted from 1 January 2024, Article 7:758(4) of the Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW, Dutch Civil Code) contains a special liability rule for defects not discovered at handover. According to IPLO, it cannot be varied to a consumer’s detriment. For a professional client, a detrimental departure requires an express provision in the agreement; a standard clause in general terms alone is insufficient.
Therefore establish the contract date and type of work before assessing an exclusion of liability. The private-law building rules also do not all have the same transitional rules. A contractor cannot show that every protection is excluded merely by a general reference to “old terms”. Conversely, a consumer rule does not automatically invalidate a business contract.
5. Payment and security need their own analysis
A clause requiring advance payment, fixing a due date or excluding suspension affects your ability to exert pressure. Establish which part of the invoice is genuinely disputed and why. A broad payment stoppage without comparing the defect, repair costs and retained amount can create a new dispute. Have the lawyer assess both the clause and your statutory defence together.
The statutory five-percent arrangement may apply to private construction of a new home. It is not a general rule for every renovation. IPLO describes the notarial deposit and conditions for release or replacement security. Terms mentioning a bank guarantee do not establish that its wording provides equivalent protection. Obtain the guarantee itself and check its amount, duration and conditions for making a claim.
6. Match your objection to the solution you want
Tell the contractor which provision you dispute and what consequences they attach to it. At the same time request the version relied upon and proof it was provided. This avoids arguing about an entire book of terms when the real issue is one price increase. A lawyer can formulate the correct avoidance, interpretation or rejection of reliance and expressly preserve your other rights.
Also check any dispute-resolution or arbitration clause before incurring procedural costs. The route depends on the contract and the protection applicable to your situation. A trade-association logo does not by itself establish a dispute body’s jurisdiction. Assess too whether discussions remain possible without allowing a necessary complaint, opportunity to repair or other deadline to expire.
7. Fictional example: liability shifted to the owner
In 2025, Mila contracts as a private individual for an extension. After handover, leakage emerges from a concealed connection. The contractor cites a clause making the owner responsible for every defect discovered after handover. Mila keeps the quotation and sees that the terms were only sent with the final invoice. She has both the provision of the terms and the clause’s substance assessed.
The lawyer investigates the date of contracting, the technical cause and the applicable liability rule. The general exclusion does not decide the case. It must also still be established which defect was discovered and whether it is attributable to the contractor. Mila requests a substantiated repair proposal and leaves a reasonable opportunity to repair. This example guarantees no outcome; different facts may lead to a different assessment.
8. Checklist for reviewing your building terms
Before the meeting, prepare a file showing what was agreed and why the clause is now causing harm. A complete timeline avoids the assessment getting stuck in general questions about small print.
- The agreement, quotation and all versions of general terms supplied, including dispatch dates.
- Your status as consumer or business client and the use of the structure.
- The specific clause, the contractor’s reliance on it and the disputed amount or repairs.
- Evidence of defects, payments, complaints and access offered for inspection or repair.
- A specific desired solution and the next payment, response or procedural deadline.
Frequently asked questions
Are terms invalid if I did not sign them?
Not automatically. Signature is not the only way agreements arise. Have incorporation and the opportunity for timely access assessed separately.
Does the entire building contract disappear if a clause is set aside?
Usually the agreement and other provisions remain. The effect of removing the particular clause on your rights still needs assessment.
May a contractor exclude all liability after handover?
A general clause does not establish that. Factors include the contract date, consumer status and the special rule for undiscovered building defects.
Can I stop paying while the terms are investigated?
An investigation does not automatically permit a complete payment stoppage. Have the specific basis for suspension, scope of the dispute and risk of late payment assessed.
Sources
These sources relate to this page. For a specific case, check current rules and your own documents.
- ACM ConsuWijzer: algemene voorwaarden Accessed: 2026-10-23
- IPLO: aansprakelijkheid bij de Wet kwaliteitsborging voor het bouwen Accessed: 2026-10-23
- IPLO: opschortingsrecht en de vijfprocentregeling Accessed: 2026-10-23
Legal review
Not legally reviewed yetThis version has not been reviewed by a lawyer or legal professional. Checking sources or editing text is not legal approval.
Editorial team Construction law in the Netherlands
We connect explanations to sources and record targeted changes. Legal review is attributed only to the actual reviewed version, with a real reviewer, date and scope. Human legal review of these articles remains open.

Ricardo van der Spoel
Editorial responsibility · Editorial organisation and technology




